Say hello to


CPA | Principal

Hillary is an extreme planner even when she’s having fun (which means traveling, snowmobiling, biking, and other activities not involving sitting still).

By Joe Haberzetle, JD LLM and Jennifar Hill, JD LLM

Among the issues Washington will vote on in the November election is whether the state should enact the Carbon Pollution Tax Act via Initiative 732. The Initiative proposes a tax on the sale or use of carbon. If it passes, Washington will be the first state in the nation to impose a carbon tax.

Overview of the Proposed Carbon Tax

Initiative 732 is modeled after British Columbia’s 2008 Carbon Tax Act. The objective of the carbon tax is to change behaviors by taxing activities that contribute to global climate change. Specifically, the goals of Initiative 732 are to encourage businesses to develop and use alternative energy solutions, decrease non-renewable electricity consumption and, ultimately, reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Proponents of Initiative 732 hope to accomplish these goals by imposing a tax on businesses and consumers, measured by the carbon content in fossil fuels and electricity consumed in the state. Carbon emissions would only be taxed once by the state. Businesses will pay the tax when buying or bringing fossil fuel into the state, and consumers will see the tax passed on to them in their electricity and fuel bills. The act’s effective date would be July 1, 2017.

Measuring the tax is straightforward, at least initially. The tax on each metric ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted would be $15 during the first year, and rise to $25 during the second year.  For reference, unleaded gasoline emits approximately 20 pounds of CO2 per gallon, so the carbon tax would equate to about 15 cents per gallon in year one and 25 cents per gallon in year two. Each year thereafter, the measure of the tax would escalate by 3.5% plus inflation, and be capped at $100 (in 2016 dollars). The tax would reach its $100 cap in 2059 and would only increase with inflation, thereafter.

According to Carbon Washington, the group behind Initiative 732, the carbon tax is not intended to be an overall tax increase, but rather a shift of the tax burden. In addition to imposing the carbon tax, Initiative 732 would incrementally reduce the state-level sales tax from 6.5% to 5.5% by July 1, 2018. It would also lower the manufacturing B&O tax rate from 0.484% to 0.0001%.

The proceeds of the carbon tax would be allocated to the state’s general fund, which may be spent for any governmental purpose. However, under Initiative 732, the tax would fund the state’s currently unfunded Working Family Tax Rebate (WFTR). The WFTR was set up in 2008 to provide an annual sales tax refunds to individuals who qualify equal-to-a-percentage of the federal Earned Income Credit.

There is ongoing debate regarding Carbon Washington’s claim that Initiative 732 is revenue neutral. The Department of Revenue’s latest fiscal projection predicts an almost $800 million revenue loss during the first five years of the Initiative. Carbon Washington has publicly disputed the Department’s projection and continues to assert that the carbon tax is designed to be a revenue neutral swap – and it may even be revenue positive.

Thoughts about Initiative 732

The initiative raises a number of issues, such as whether a tax on carbon is the most effective mechanism for combating climate change (as opposed to a “cap & trade” system, for example). It also raises the question of whether tax policy is an appropriate tool for trying to implement large-scale behavioral change. A few more observations on the proposed tax:

  • The carbon tax would operate essentially as a ‘sin’ tax, such as the high taxes currently imposed on cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana and other substances that are recognized to have some negative impacts on the user and/or society. Sin taxes are inherently self-defeating; if they influence behavior as intended, the tax base will decrease over time with the decreased consumption of the item being taxed. Ultimately, in order to maintain tax collections, the tax rate must increase commensurate with decreased consumption – as is the intent of Initiative 732. However, decreased demand is unlikely to be linear over time. This means that the revenue from a sin tax is inherently less predictable than that from a general consumption tax, like the sales tax.
  • Both the support and opposition to the initiative are diverse – neither the business nor the environmental communities are united in favoring or opposing the measure. Because of the reduction in the general sales tax and manufacturing B&O tax rates, many businesses – particularly those that are relatively less energy intensive – could see a reduction in their overall tax burden if the initiative passes. On the other side, several prominent environmental and social justice organizations have come out in opposition to the measure. This is either because they feel it will be ineffective in preventing catastrophic climate change, or because they fear the measure will have a disproportionate impact on communities of color and low-income people.
  • Federal income tax law allows individuals a deduction for either state income tax or state sales tax paid. Because Washington does not impose an individual income tax, most state residents who itemize deductions claim the sales tax deduction. Because Initiative 732 would reduce the sales tax rate by 1% statewide, it would also reduce the amount of the sales tax deduction for Washington residents in 2017 and future years. The impact on most taxpayers would be relatively insignificant, however. For example, the increase in federal income tax for a household earning $100,000 per year would likely be less than $50 per year. There would be no impact on taxpayers that take the standard deduction rather than itemizing deductions on their federal tax return.

Although it may be somewhat overshadowed by the results at the top of the ballot, it will be fascinating to see whether Washington will become the first state to tax carbon consumption. Only time will tell whether Initiative 732 is on the leading edge of future tax policy, or just a creative idea that gets relegated to the dustbin of history.

© Clark Nuber PS and Developing News, 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Clark Nuber PS and Developing News with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Keep Reading

Articles and Publications

How Do You Measure Business Growth?

“Our sales team has achieved 5% year-over-year growth every year for the past three years. We’re very pleased…” But should we be? You’ve likely heard the saying, “a rising tide lifts all boats.” While there is a great deal of controversy regarding whether or not a growing economy results in individual company growth, there is no question that overall spending patterns increase as economies become healthier. It is also widely accepted that demand for products and services results more from changes in the market overall, than from our own sales acumen. So how do you measure business growth? There are many analytical ways to measure growth. A classic, easy method is to compare year-over-year top line revenues, which we will focus on here, instead of profit margins. By this method, it’s possible to create 5% revenue growth by simply raising prices 5% and selling the same volume of product or service. While this is a viable option for achieving tangible financial growth, it may be worth asking yourself, “Does this model accurately track and meet our growth plans?” It is important for your company to be able to measure meaningful growth parameters and establish growth goals. Many industries remember 2008 as a “crash” year. The consequent recession spurred a period wherein many companies were lucky to merely maintain past year sales trends. Two examples of markets that did not follow that trend, however, are the cruise industry and GDP in India.

Niche Industry Growth

The cruise industry has seen steady growth, measured in passengers per year, for the past 20+ years. Worldwide growth was 5.7% in 2008 and 9.1% in 2009 - just when many companies were struggling to stay in business. During this period, some industries measured success in limiting the freefall of sales and others continued to operate in growth sectors. Recognizing industry-specific trends is key to understanding what your company’s growth should look like. For example, if a cruise operator accepted nominal growth in the years following 2008, thinking that the recession was affecting spending, they would have been settling for lower performance than industry norms.

Demographic Growth

India never noticed 2008. Although the recession affected many countries outside the US, industry growth in India (after a very small and short correction) continued unabated. And while GDP growth flattened globally in 2011, India saw record growth rates between 2008 and 2011. Micro economies within the US are also influenced geographically. For example, although growing now, Michigan’s post-recession economy has recovered much more slowly than most of the West Coast.


Growth by acquisition is another common, more obvious, strategy. The key to successfully measuring performance is being able to segregate performance of the legacy company and performance in the acquisition. This allows company owners to measure the organic growth within each entity. If all performance is measured immediately as a single company, it is difficult to determine how the legacy and acquired company are performing independently.


Comparing how your company is doing in relation to your competitors can be a valuable tool for measuring comparative performance in your industry niche. If we establish a 5% growth goal based on overall economy growth, but neglect to include comparison to peer companies in our market space, we are ignoring a critical component. During periods of high industry growth, we may be “leaving money on the table” if we ignore competitive performance. For example, the immense wireless communications industry thrives or dies based on competition. Twenty years ago, the increase of new online users lead to a significant growth in the industry. The relative affordability of equipment and services (who pays for long distance anymore?) has created an industry that emphasizes stealing customers from competitors more than creating actual new users. An indication of this trend is the ubiquitous offer many carriers make to “pay your termination fee.”

Absolute Growth

Year-over-year organic growth is, and should be, a measure defining company growth. The data to establish absolute growth (percentage growth of revenue, this year over last year) can be found in internal reporting. It does not require studies or conjecture regarding industry trends, geography, or competition. We must keep in mind that using only an arbitrary, straight-line growth goal model is a disservice to our company; we are either setting up unreasonable, lofty goals or allowing ourselves to be satisfactorily underperforming.

In Summary

Regardless of how it’s measured, growth is critical to the sustained health of a company. The adage “sales growth cures all ills” has more than a small ring of truth. It is unusual for a company to have static revenues continually – it either grows, goes out of business, or is acquired at a discount! Understand your market trends and pressures. Dig into what competition is doing. Use data that measure several different parameters to establish aggressive, but achievable, growth goals. © 2016 Clark Nuber PS All Rights Reserved

Understanding Business Value

Business value enhancement is the daily job of the CEO – and that responsibility covers a wide landscape. The CEO is interested in customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, risk management, and strengthening the team culture, among many other daily responsibilities. Often, other executives share these responsibilities, which become part of the ongoing process of pursuing business success. Apart from the day-to-day responsibilities of focusing on business value drivers, there are times when a holistic view is more valuable to knowing that you are on track. This involves lifting the team’s attention above the horizon so that they can consider their current path. All would agree that preparation for sale is a good time to focus on understanding business value. Professional valuations are routinely performed for purchase and sale transactions. Similarly, if a business is granting equity-based compensation, advisors recommend professional valuations to support management and board decisions. However, waiting until a sale transaction to subject your business to a professional valuation, which has uncertain results, is much like selling your house subject to the results of a home inspection when you have not thoroughly inspected the home yourself. Scary at best. Other events in your business’s life should also trigger an analysis of the business’s basic health factors, which are the building blocks of value. Our CoreValue tool refers to these health factors as Value Drivers. CoreValue helps business owners analyze the health of each driver before, during, or after significant business changes occur, so that they can better navigate those changes. In one situation, for example, a business’ CEO role passed suddenly from founder to daughter. Even though the daughter had been involved in the business, she had not been in the position of managing the day-to-day operations of the business – much less in determining the overall business direction. Had this transition been planned, the founder could have examined the Value Drivers with his daughter, and the executive team, in advance and facilitated a smooth hand-off. As it was, this situation triggered a need to take stock of the Value Drivers. Through evaluating the business’ strengths, weaknesses, and areas of potential growth, the new CEO was able to initiate a smooth transition and pursue a productive new business direction. In another situation, the prospective buyers were conducting due diligence on a target business. Though questions were being asked and answers were being documented, things were not adding up to support the multiple of earnings that the seller wanted. The buyer then turned to the CoreValue tool, which helped them focus quickly and objectively on the factors that contributed to a lower value. This helped guide the discussion with the seller, and ultimately resulted in a better-negotiated outcome. These are just two situations that demonstrate how CoreValue can help business leaders and investors understand the value of an ever-changing business. In certain situations, a formal certified valuation may be required or warranted. However, CoreValue is an excellent solution for executive teams that want to determine where to invest effort and resources, and how to have the greatest impact in growing the enterprise value and profitability of their business. © 2016 Clark Nuber PS All Rights Reserved

How Targeted Year-End Planning Will Help with Business Value Enhancement

Now is the time of year for business owners and management to review their current year successes, reevaluate their direction, and develop goals and action steps for the next year. This sounds like an easy step, but in reality, it can be an overwhelming task. Many would argue that the time spent on year-end planning can be time consuming and ineffective. Where should business owners and management start?

Where to Start

Consider looking at your business in a new light. Get to know the key drivers that enhance your business value and growth. Ask yourself the tough questions:
  • Why do you feel your business has revenue growth potential?
  • Do you have information about your competitors and market?
  • Does your company have margin advantage?
  • What areas in your business are weak?
  • What is causing problems in these areas?
  • How are these problems affecting the company’s potential for growth?
  • Does the company follow best practices in financial matters?
  • Do you have the right people in leadership positions with the required capabilities?
  • Are you able to attract and retain quality employees?

Identify Priorities

Undertaking too many initiatives can overwhelm a team and create a lack of focus. Resources are limited, so prioritizing initiatives that will bring the biggest return to the company will reduce time, energy, and misdirected money. Based on your analysis of the key drivers that enhance your business value, identify those areas that, if acted upon, will bring your company the “biggest bang for its buck.” Where are your gaps and what steps can be taken to close those gaps? Do areas of risk exist that will hinder your company’s sustainable growth? Address your specific challenges for growth by focusing on the highest priorities first.

Set Measureable Goals

What will success look like? Employees are motivated to actively contribute to the success of the company when it is clear what they are working to achieve. Consider setting SMART goals - goals that are specific, achievable, realistic and timely. A specific goal should answer “who,” “what,” “where,” “when,” and “why.” Establish concrete criteria for measuring the progress and attainment of a goal. Be sure that the goals are important and are realistically attainable within a specified time frame. For example, a smart goal for margin growth may be, “We will increase the gross profit percentage on the blue gadget product line from 45% to 50% by December 31, 2017.” Invest some quality time working on your business, now. Clark Nuber can help you get started. We can work with you and your team to identify opportunities for business growth and the top risks in achieving that growth. This first step can provide focus to your strategic planning sessions, leading to an effective and valuable use of your time and resources. Preparation is key to year-end planning success. © 2016 Clark Nuber PS All Rights Reserved

Featured Resources